Course
Description, Rationale, and Outcomes
Texts, Suggested
Readings, and Resources
Competency
Based Documentation Packet and PPA
Supervised
student teaching experience in a preschool setting with children, infancy
through age five. Emphasis on
development, implementation and evaluation of innovative preschool
programs. The student participates in a
total program, five days a week for eight weeks in either a day care center,
nursery school or Head Start program.
Course Rationale:
After careful research, discussion, and reflection, the faculty of the Early Childhood Education program voted to commit themselves to the constructivist paradigm for teaching and learning. In the professional courses, strategies are modeled where candidates experience inquiry learning. Candidates are provided multiple opportunities to interact with partners and engage cooperatively in small group discussions and class assignments. It is through experiencing and reflecting upon these strategies that candidates begin to understand the impact of such strategies on academic achievement. In the professional courses, the role of the instructor is not primarily to tell and correct, but rather to watch and ask such questions as: What happened? What did you notice? Professional Education students take responsibility for their own learning.
The
Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks provide a common guide for
The
faculty of the Early Childhood program encourage candidates to use technology
as a learning tool and teaching tool during their prepracticum
experiences. The
Course Objective and Outcomes
1. Candidates will teach and observe a variety of lessons demonstrating knowledge of developmentally appropriate practices and the subject matter of early childhood school curriculum, as outlined in the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks and NCATE standards. Students will demonstrate knowledge of content, current methodology and organizational skills and appropriate technology to effectively meet the needs of all learners, including culturally and linguistically diverse and special needs learners.
2. Candidates will design, teach and evaluate an integrated unit, utilizing a variety of instructional strategies that take into account the developmental stage and needs of all children as well as the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks.
3. Candidates will show the ability to communicate (orally and in writing) with children, parents, community members, school personnel, and other professional colleagues in a clear, understandable, and sensitive manner.
4. Candidates will demonstrate the ability to reflect upon and self-evaluate activities designed and taught by the candidate and use this reflection to improve practice.
5. Candidates will participate on staff committees and in workshops, seminars and other professional growth activities, and will be encouraged to join professional organizations.
6. Candidates will demonstrate the ability to organize and manage a classroom so as to foster children’s creative and analytical thinking skills, deal equitably and responsibly with all learners and show sensitivity to cultural and learning differences.
7. Candidates will use multiple forms of assessment, showing sensitivity to learning styles and the needs of all learners and using assessment results to inform instruction.
8. Candidates will take sole responsibility for an extended period of time – typically one week – for all aspects of the classroom, including designing activities/lessons, setting up a safe and stimulating environment, teaching, managing the classroom, administering IEPs, and communicating with administration, support staff, and parents.
9. Candidates will familiarize themselves with the individual learning needs of the children, including IEP assessments and goals, and will participate in adapting strategies, environments, and curriculum to meet identified needs.
10. Candidates will create a competency portfolio
(see requirements, separate page), illustrating
and corroborating competence in the state-mandated areas of: subject
matter knowledge, communication skills, instructional practice, evaluation,
problem solving, equity, collaboration with families, and professionalism.
Shafer and
Gower, The Skillful Teacher, is
strongly recommended. All prepracticum materials, notebooks, texts, etc. should
be reviewed for instructional ideas and strategies. Your professors selected
their textbooks and materials with care.
Use them as resources for weak areas and guidance for unit design. Remember the Massachusetts Curriculum
Framework (always on the web) is another excellent resource.
Professional
Journals and Magazines
Candidates are encouraged to extract ideas from professional journals and how-to magazines. Some recommendations:
The
Language
Arts
Primary
Voices K-6
Young
Children
The
Science Teacher
Social
Studies Journal
Teaching
Children Mathematics
Some
“recipe” magazines:
Instructor
Mailbox (look for your grade level)
Learning
Books:
Children’s textbooks-The curriculum library contains a variety of children’s textbooks and instructor manuals. These are excellent resources for lesson content, age appropriateness and motivational ideas. In your unit design, look through as many as possible. Make a professional decision on what to include, the best instructional sequence and what instructional strategies should be employed to meet the needs of all learners.
Professional Books for resources:
Technology resources:
Web sites given out or used in prepracticum courses
Dr. Marvelle’s homepage has an excellent resource for portfolio information (jmarvelle@bridgew.edu)
E-mail your supervisor for quick results, if you
have a question concerning methodology, e-mail that professor see (first
initial, last name@bridgew.edu) e.g.--sgreenberg@bridgew.edu
1.
Throughout the semester you should be reviewing these guidelines and the PPA
and be gathering evidence of your experiences and competencies and keeping them
in a WORKING Portfolio. This evidence will include artifacts (lessons,
assessments, copies of student work), an analysis of student achievement, and
reflections about the experiences you are having. At the end of the semester you will be
writing reflections and SELECTING your BEST EVIDENCE to prove your
competency in each of the identified categories. Remember; we are looking for quality,
not quantity.
2. Your
documentation will be uploaded to Taskstream no later
than the next-to-last week of student teaching (unless otherwise directed). Your supervisor may advise you if they
want documentation uploaded as the semester progresses.
3. Narrative statement should be approximately
two typed-pages in length using normal size type and margins (12 point font, 1”
margins all around).
Please
keep in mind, the Student-Teaching Documentation structure was designed to
allow you, in a very straight-forward manner, to demonstrate your
competencies. It was not designed to
serve as a "Job-Search" Portfolio.
You should have a portfolio (one with some flash, i.e., resume,
pictures, etc.) to bring to an interview.
Please don’t assume that the structure used for the Student-Teaching
Documentation is appropriate for that purpose.
Elements
of the Required Documentation
|
Standard A –
Curriculum and Instruction ·
Product A1 – Thematic Unit ·
Product A2 – Lesson plans ·
Reflection A1 Standard B –
Delivers Effective Instruction ·
Product B1 – Various forms of
assessments ·
Reflection B1 Standard C –
Manages Classroom Climate and Operation ·
Product C1- Classroom Climate ·
Reflection C1 Standard D –
Promoting Equity ·
Product D1 - Adapting for Differneces ·
Reflection D1 Standard E –
Meets Professional Responsibilities ·
Product E1 – Professionalism ·
Reflection E1 Early
Childhood Assessment #1: Working with
and Advocating for Families: Offering
Ideas and Identifying Resources Early
Childhood Assessment #2: Meeting the
Needs of All Students Early
Childhood Assessment #3: Video Reflection Early
Childhood Assessment #4: Candidate Dispositions |
Early Childhood Education
11-10
All
students who graduate from Bridgewater State College’s Early Childhood and
Elementary Education programs must successfully achieve each of the
Massachusetts teaching competencies.
The purpose of the Documentation Package is to assist you in documenting
your achievements with evidence. The Department of Elementary &
Early Childhood Education has products (explained below) as vehicles for
providing this evidence. All products should be viewed in light of
developmental appropriateness. Your evidence
should represent your own work. However,
it may include information gathered and/or implemented as part of a
professional team.
Please
refer to the Student-Teaching Documentation Guidelines for information
regarding the structure you should use to present your evidence of
competencies. In addition to the Student-Teaching
Documentation , there are FOUR Early Childhood Key
Assessments. These items are discussed
at the end of this section. These
reflections and documents should be included at the end of the Documentation
Package and submitted to the Department.
When
composing your reflections, be sure to review the standards listed above each
section and incorporate them your responses. Each product / reflection should
be 1-2 pages in length.
Standard A – Plans Curriculum and
Instruction
|
Standard
A: Candidate Plans Curriculum &
Instruction
·
NAEYC 1 – Promoting child development:
Candidates use their understanding of young children’s characteristics
and needs, and of multiple interacting influences on children’s development and
learning, to create environments that are healthy, respectful, supportive and
challenging for all children.
·
NAEYC 4 – Teaching and learning:
Candidates integrate their understanding of and relationships with
children and families; their understanding of developmentally effective
approaches to teaching and learning; and their knowledge of academic
disciplines, to design, implement, and evaluate experiences that promote
positive development and learning for all children.
·
NAEYC 4a – Connecting with children and families:
Candidates know, understand, and use positive relationships and
supportive interactions as the foundation for their work with young
children.
·
NAEYC 4b – Using developmentally effective approaches: Candidates know,
understand, and use a wide array of effective approaches, strategies, and tools
to positively influence children’s development and learning.
·
NAEYC 4c – Understanding content knowledge in early education: Candidates understand the importance of each
content area in young children’s learning.
They know the essential concepts, inquiry tools, and structure of
content areas including academic subjects and can identify resources to
deepen their understanding.
·
NAEYC 4d – Building meaning curriculum: Candidates
use their own knowledge and other resources to design, implement, and evaluate
meaningful, challenging curriculum that promotes comprehensive developmental
and learning outcomes for all young children.
·
DESE – Candidate draws on content
standards of the relevant curriculum frameworks to plan sequential units of
study, individual lessons, and learning activities that make learning
cumulative and advance students’ level of content knowledge.
·
DESE - Draws on content standards of the
relevant curriculum frameworks to plan sequential units of study, individual
lessons, and learning activities that make learning cumulative and advance
students’ level of content knowledge.
·
DESE - Draws on results of formal and
informal assessments as well as knowledge of human development to identify
teaching strategies and learning activities appropriate to the specific
discipline, age, level of English language proficiency, and range of cognitive
levels being taught.
·
DESE - Identifies appropriate reading
materials, other resources, and writing activities for promoting further
learning by the full range of students within the classroom.
·
DESE - Identifies prerequisite skills,
concepts, and vocabulary needed for the learning activities and design lessons
that strengthen student reading and writing skills
·
DESE - Plans lessons with clear
objectives and relevant measurable outcomes.
·
DESE - Draws on resources from
colleagues, families, and the community to enhance learning.
·
DESE - Incorporates appropriate
technology and media in lesson planning.
·
DESE - Uses information in Individualized
Education Programs (IEPs) to plan strategies for integrating students with
disabilities into general education classrooms.
Required Products – Standard A
Product #A1 . Interdisciplinary Thematic Unit
Provide evidence that you have designed and taught a
unit (a collection of lessons – approximately 8-15 lessons -- that integrates
at least two disciplines and uses a theme.
The Unit should be presented in such as way to demonstrate your
in-depth, accurate understanding of the content that you are teaching. This
Unit should have between 3-5 major objectives (connected to the
Massachusetts Frameworks) and should include assessments related to your
stated major objectives.
Required
Products – Standard A
Product
#A2. Lesson Planning (Various
Approaches)
Candidates must provide evidence of
using various approaches to teaching. We suggest that you consider providing
evidence of these types of strategies.
These lessons
Reflection #A1: -
Standard A
Write a narrative on the importance of
knowing child development and using developmentally appropriate curriculum and
instruction within an environment that is healthy, respectful, supportive and
challenging for young children. In your
narrative, provide evidence from your lesson plans and/or unit of how you
accomplished this.
Standard B –
Delivers Effective Instruction
|
Standard B:
Candidate Delivers Effective Instruction
·
DESE - Communicates
high standards and expectations when beginning the lesson, carrying out the
lesson and when extending a lesson as well as when evaluating student learning..
Product
#B1
- Various
forms of assessment
Provide
samples of the various forms of assessment that you used. (eg open-ended questions and rubrics, observation
checklists, teacher-made tests, running record, etc.
Reflection
#B1: Evidence of Student Learning - Write
a narrative that discusses and provides evidence that your students learned
from your teaching. Discuss how you used
assessment to guide, modify and differentiate your instruction. Also discuss how you were able to maintain
high standards and expectations.
Standard C –
Manages Classroom Climate and Operation
|
Standard C:
Candidate Manages Classroom Climate and Operation
1. Creates an environment that is conducive to
learning.
2. Creates a physical environment appropriate to
a range of learning activities.
3. Maintains appropriate standards of behavior,
mutual respect, and safety.
4. Manages classroom routines and procedures
without loss of significant instructional time.
Required
Products
Product #C1
– Classroom Climate
Provide
a description of your classroom climate, operation procedures, and classroom
discipline (provide evidence from both placements). Note,
this is NOT intended to be a reflection.
Reflection
C1:
Write a personal statement that reflects upon your work to develop and manage
an effective classroom climate.
Standard D – Promotes
Equity
|
1. Encourages all students to believe that
effort is a key to achievement.
2. Works to promote achievement by all students
without exception.
3. Assesses the significance of student
differences in home experiences, background knowledge, learning skills,
learning pace, and proficiency in the English language for learning the
curriculum at hand and uses professional judgment to determine if instructional
adjustments are necessary.
4. Helps all students to understand American
civic culture, its underlying ideals, founding political principles and
political institutions, and to see themselves as members of a local, state,
national, and international civic community.
Product
#D1.
Adapting for Differences
Adapting
for Differences – Describe what accommodations you made in your classroom for
students who were on IEP’s, 504 plans, or who have linguistic needs (ELL)?
Reflection #D1: #
Write
a personal statement that discusses how you promoted equity for all students.
Standard E –
Meets Professional Responsibilities
|
Standard E:
Candidate Meets Professional Responsibilities
1. NAEYC 5. Becoming a
professional: Candidates identify and
conduct themselves as members of the early childhood profession. They know and use ethical guidelines and
other professional standards related to early childhood practice. They are
continuous, collaborative learners who demonstrate knowledgeable, reflective,
and critical perspectives on their work, making informed decisions that
integrate knowledge from a variety of sources.
They are informed advocates for sound educational practices and
policies.
2. NAEYC – Becoming a
professional: Candidates identify and
conduct themselves as members of the early childhood profession. They know and use ethical guidelines and
other professional standards related to early childhood practice. They are
continuous, collaborative learners who demonstrate knowledgeable, reflective,
and critical perspectives on their work, making informed decisions that
integrate knowledge from a variety of sources.
They are informed advocates for sound educational practices and
policies.
3. Understands his or her legal and
moral responsibilities.
4. Conveys knowledge of and
enthusiasm for his/her academic discipline to students.
5. Maintains interest in current
theory, research, and developments in the academic discipline and exercises
judgment in accepting implications or findings as valid for application in
classroom practice.
6. Collaborates with colleagues to
improve instruction, assessment, and student achievement.
7. Works actively to involve parents
in their child’s academic activities and performance, and communicates clearly
with them.
8. Reflects critically upon his or
her teaching experience, identifies areas for further professional development
as part of a professional development plan that is linked to grade level,
school, and district goals, and is receptive to suggestions for growth.
9. Understands legal and ethical
issues as they apply to responsible and acceptable use of the Internet and
other resources.
Product
#E1. Professionalism
Collection
of professional
activities such as attending in-service workshop, taking an
advocacy workshop in your community, etc.
Reflection #E1: Discuss how you
have grown as a professional educator since entering the teacher preparation
program. Tell what you have done along
your path to becoming a professional educator (eg
joining SEAM or KDP, volunteering in the Childrens
Physical Development
Clinic, etc)
Early Childhood Key Assessments
·
Early Childhood Assessment #1: Working with and Advocating for
Families: Offering Ideas and Identifying
Resources
·
Early Childhood Assessment #2: Meeting the Needs of All Students
· Early Childhood
Assessment #3: Video Reflection
·
Early Childhood Assessment #4:
Candidate Dispositions
These
reflections and documents should be uploaded to Taskstream
EC NCATE Assessment 1 - Working with and Advocating for Families
Target: NAEYC Standard 2: Building Families and Community Relationships
NAEYC 4a –
Connecting with children and families:
Candidates know, understand, and use positive relationships and
supportive interactions as the foundation for their work with young children.
DOE
– Candidate draws on resources from colleagues, families, and the community to
enhance learning.
Required Product:
-- Community Context
Essay
Task: Write a narrative on the importance of the
family in early childhood education. In your narrative, include references to
things you did in your student teaching experience. Provide evidence.
SCORING RUBRIC-
Assessment 1
NAEYC Standard 2: Building Families and Community Relationships – The candidate knows about,
understands, and values the importance and complex characteristics of
children’s families and communities.
They use this understanding to create respectful, reciprocal
relationships that support and empower families, and to involve all families in
their children’s development and learning.
Candidates know, understand, and use positive relationships and
supportive interactions as the foundation for their work with young children.
NAEYC
4a – Connecting with children and families:
Candidates know, understand, and use positive relationships and
supportive interactions as the foundation for their work with young
children.
DOE
– Candidate draws on resources from colleagues, families, and the community to
enhance learning
The
reflection and the required product – “Family & Community Package” – will
be reviewed holistically using this rubric.
|
Unacceptable 0-1 |
Acceptable 2-3
|
Target 4-5 |
Rating |
|
The language used in
the reflection or in the various documents either don’t show respect
and value of families or it is difficult to tell how the candidate feels
about the importance of families. |
The reflection and the documents show
respect and value of families. |
Documents show clearly The reflection
and the documents clearly show respect and value of families. |
|
|
The reflection, the Context essay
and/or the documents are poorly designed and/or contain numerous errors –
either factual or related to conventions of writing. |
The reflection, the Context essay
and/or the documents are well designed with few errors related to conventions
of writing. |
The reflection, the Context essay
and/or the documents are well designed and well written. |
/5 |
|
Minimal evidence of involving
parents/families in their children’s education. |
The “List of How You Worked with
Parents” provides tangible evidence of involving parents/families in their
children’s education. |
The “List of How You Worked with
Parents” provides numerous and significant efforts to involve
parents/families in their children’s education. |
/5 |
TOTAL: /15
_____
12-15 Target _____ 6-11 Acceptable _____ 0-5 Unacceptable
EC NCATE Assessment 2: Meeting
the Needs of All Students
This
key assessment should be submitted with the Documentation Package. It will be reviewed by the Early Childhood
Department to assess a candidate’s work with and advocacy for families.
Reflection: Write a personal statement that discusses and
reflects upon how you differentiated your instruction for a child with a
special need or an English Language Learner.
Use the required product to provide evidence for your statement.
Required Product:
“Case Study: Modifying
Instruction for a Child with Special Needs and/or an English Language Learner”
Task: With
the assistance of your cooperating teacher, identify a child who has a special
need (who has an IEP or a 504 Plan or who is currently being observed for
possible referral) or is designated as an English Language Learner. Observe the child for a period of time –
using various assessments, including anecdotal notes and using other
kid-watching techniques. Based on your
findings, write a plan to modify the instruction or to modify the
environment to meet the needs of this student.
Implement modifications and continue to observe and continue to
modify instruction and providing appropriate supports, if necessary.
Directions:
·
The
assessments that you used (including samples of student work)
·
Your
lesson plan or your classroom procedure and indicate how you modified
the instruction or the procedures for the particular case-study child.
·
Include
copies of any teaching tools (i.e., graphic organizers that you used;
photographs of adaptive devises that you provided; and/or descriptions of
modifications that you made).
EC
NCATE Assessment 2: Meeting the Needs of All Students
Standard: The candidates know about, understand, and
modify instruction for children with special needs.
The
reflection and the required project – “Case Study: Modifying Instruction for a Child with
Special Needs and/or an English Language Learner” – will be reviewed holistically
using this rubric.
|
Unacceptable 0-1 |
Acceptable 2-3
|
Target 4-5 |
Rating |
|
Limited or ineffective use of
assessments – i.e., lack of various types, bias assessments, unreliable or
invalid assessments. Minimal or no evidence that the
candidate understands the use of assessments to guide instruction. Assessments and samples of student
work are not provided. |
Evaluator has some concerns re: bias,
reliability or validity – although not to the point of total ineffectiveness. The candidate’s work demonstrates an
understanding of the use of assessments to guide instruction. Limited number of assessments and few
(or no) samples of student work are not provided. |
Effective use of assessments. The candidate’s work demonstrates an
understanding of the use of assessments to guide instruction. Assessments and samples of student
work provided. |
/5 |
|
Minimal evidence that the candidate
researched or worked with other resource personnel to design ways to modify
instruction for the student. |
The candidate’s work provides some
evidence that he/she conducted researched and/or worked with resource
personnel to design ways to modify instruction for the student. |
The candidate’s work demonstrates that
he/she researched or worked with resource personnel to design numerous
effective ways to modify instruction for the student. |
/5 |
|
The
reflection and/or the case study are poorly organized and/or poorly written
(i.e., containing numerous efforts – either factual or related to conventions
of writing). |
The
reflection and/or the case study are generally well organized and well
written. |
The
reflection and the case study are well designed and professionally produced. |
/5 |
TOTAL: /15
_____
12-15 Target _____ 6-11 Acceptable _____ 0-5 Unacceptable
EC
NCATE Assessment 3: Video Reflections
Components: Two video are to be recorded during
designated times in
your student teaching experience.
One is to be recorded within the first three weeks of your experience, the second is to be done during the
instruction of your unit. Each video should have its own reflection.
You are to
reflect upon these two lessons by viewing the tape and writing your thoughts
down.
Use the following questions to guide
this reflection.
EC
NCATE Assessment 3: Video Reflections
The
reflection and the required project – “Case Study: Modifying Instruction for a Child with
Special Needs and/or an English Language Learner” – will be reviewed holistically
using this rubric.
|
Unacceptable 0-1 |
Acceptable 2-3
|
Target 4-5 |
Rating |
||
|
The
reflection/evidence includes most questions or components of the question. 2.The reflection/evidence supports the standard. 3.The
reflection/evidence shows some insight and analysis of the required component
|
1.The
reflection/evidence includes all questions or components of the question. 2.The reflection/evidence strongly supports the standard. 3.The reflection/evidence shows deep insight and analysis
of the required component. |
/5 |
TOTAL: /5
_____ 4-5
Target _____ 2-3 Acceptable _____ 0-1 Unacceptable
------------------------------------------------------
PPA – Pre-Service Performance Assessment
The
Massachusetts Department of Education has developed a set of five standards for
the practicum. Each standard has a
number of indicators. Candidates must provide evidence for each indicator. This
evidence will be reviewed by the cooperating practitioner and college
supervisor and rated. Each of the five standards must receive at least a “meets
the standard” for licensure (Form D).