Summary of Findings
For Each Student by Test Feature
Subject A-Reading
Comprehension
Subject A-Listening
Comprehension
Subject A-Metacomprehension
Subject B-Reading
Comprehension
Subject B-Listening
Comprehension
Subject B-Metacomprehension
Subject A -Reading Comprehension
Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA)-
Narrative Text: Comprehension Skills and Strategies
No data
available for comparison.
Developmental Reading Assessment
(DRA)-Expository Text: Comprehension Skills and Strategies

Comparison of pretest and posttest scores for nonfiction text revealed a
4-point gain in performance. Subject A received a score of 11 prior to
intervention
and 15 following intervention. Comparison of performance revealed a gain in 1-point, from a 2 to a 3, in making predictions. Subject A obtained a
score of 2 prior to and following intervention on summarizing information in the story
after it was read. A gain of 1- point,
from a score of 2 to 3, was observed on the posttest score for literal
comprehension and interpretation. A 1-point gain, from a 1 to a 2,
was noted when subject A was required to provide a reflection about the
story. Subject A’s metacognitive awareness score remained constant, a
score of 2, from pre-intervention to post-intervention. It is important to note that
for this subtest, the same story was administered prior to and following
intervention.
The familiarity with the text may have impacted the gains observed on
the posttest score (Return to Summary of Finding).
Back to Top
Informal Reading Inventory-7th Edition
(B/RIRI-7)-Narrative Text: Comprehension Score

Subject A’s
skills in comprehending narrative passages showed a small improvement
from pre-intervention to post-intervention. The student achieved a score of 80% correct
prior to intervention and 90% correct following intervention when asked to read a
third-grade passage, which was found to be the student’s independent
reading level, and answer a variety of questions types, such as the main
idea, details, cause and effect, inference, and vocabulary. A 10-point
increase was achieved (Return to Summary of
Finding).
Back to Top
Informal Reading
Inventory-7th Edition (B/RIRI-7)- Expository Text:
Comprehension Score

A comparison of pretest and posttest scores on fifth-grade reading passages
revealed a small improvement in comprehending nonfiction text. Subject
A achieved 30% correct pre-intervention and 50% correct post-intervention.
Prior to the intervention, the student answered 3 out of 10 questions correct either by answering a series of closed-ended
questions. Following the intervention,
5 out of 10 questions were answered correctly. The same test was
administered prior to and following intervention due to the alternate reading passage
for this test being fiction (Return to Summary
of Finding).
Back to Top
Subject A-Listening Comprehension
Informal Reading Inventory-7th Edition (B/RIRI-7):
Narrative Text

The
B/RIRI-7 was used to further assess listening comprehension skills.
A decrease in performance was observed from pre-intervention to
post-intervention, using a
primer level passage, in which subject A was required to listen to a
narrative and answer a variety of questions, by answering questions in a closed-response format. Subject A
received a 25-point decrease in performance from 62.5% correct
pre-intervention to
37.5% correct post-intervention. Prior to the intervention, subject A answered 5 out
of 8 questions correct. Following the intervention, the student
answered 3 out of 8 questions correct (Return
to Summary of Finding).
Back to Top
Informal Reading Inventory-7th Edition (B/RIRI-7):
Expository Text

Comparison of
pretest and posttest scores for listening comprehension using the B/RIRI-7
revealed a 15-point increase in subject A’s ability to comprehend expository
text through closed-ended comprehension questions. The student
received a score of 20% correct pre-intervention and 35% correct post-intervention.
Prior to the intervention,
subject A answered 2 out of 10 questions correct. Following the
intervention, the
student answered three and one
half out of 10 questions correct. Overall, the change in score revealed an increase in
listening comprehension skills of fifth-grade expository text passages (Return
to Summary of Finding).
Back to Top
Subject A-Metacognition
Developmental
Reading Assessment (DRA): Narrative Text
No data
obtained for comparison.
Developmental
Reading Assessment (DRA): Expository Text

Subject
A’s ability to identify and apply strategies while reading nonfiction
text remained unchanged, a score of 2, from pre-intervention to
post-intervention. No gains were
observed in this area (Return to Summary of
Finding).
Back to Top
Subject B-Reading Comprehension
Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA):
Narrative Text

A
comparison of subject B’s pretest and posttest scores on the DRA
revealed a 2-point increase on the comprehension skills and strategies
subtest. This demonstrated some growth in subject B’s reading comprehension
skills. A detailed analysis of subject B’s performance revealed no
change on the prediction subtest, revealing a score of 3
pre-intervention and post-intervention. The student’s summarization skills improved by
1-point from a score of 2 pre-intervention to a 3 post-intervention. Literal comprehension remained constant, a score of
3 prior to and following intervention. Subject B’s
interpretive skills improved by 1-point from a 2 pre-intervention to a
3 post-intervention. Skills in reflection and metacognitive awareness
remained constant, a score of 2 pre-intervention and post-intervention, indicating no
growth in this area (Return to Summary of
Finding).
Back to Top
Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA):
Expository Text

Subject B’s skills in reading comprehension for expository text were also
found to improve from pre-intervention to post-intervention. The student achieved a
score of 13 on the comprehension skills and strategies subtest
pre-intervention and a
score of 15 post-intervention, demonstrating a 2-point gain in reading
comprehension skills. The student demonstrated a 1-point, a score of 2
pre-intervention and 3 post-intervention, in prediction making. No change in score was
reported on the summarization subtest, a score of 2 prior to and following
intervention, was noted when asked to summarize the story in written form.
The literal comprehension score remained constant at a score of 3 prior to
and following intervention. A 1-point gain was observed when subject B
was asked to answer an interpretive question, achieving a score of 2
pre-intervention and a 3 post-intervention. No change in score was observed on the reflection subtest,
revealing a score of 3 pre-intervention and post-intervention. The metacognitive awareness score
also remained constant, with a score of 2 pre-intervention and
post-intervention (Return
to Summary of Finding).
Back to Top
Informal Reading Inventory-7th Edition (B/RIRI-7):
Narrative Text

Upon reviewing
subject B’s pretest and posttest scores for reading comprehension of
third-grade narrative passages, a 30-point increase in performance was
found. Subject B achieved a score of 60% correct pre-intervention on the
B/RIRI-7 by answering 6 out of 10 questions correctly. The posttest score was 90% correct indicating that subject
B answered 9 out of 10 questions correctly (Return
to Summary of Finding).
Back to Top
Informal Reading Inventory-7th Edition (B/RIRI-7):
Expository Text

Reading
comprehension of fifth-grade expository text passages was also found to
improve following intervention. Subject B achieved a pretest score of 40%,
revealing 4 out of 10 questions answered correctly. Following
intervention,
subject B obtained a score of 60%, which demonstrated a 20-point increase in
performance. Due to the
alternate test for the fifth-grade passage being fiction, the same
passage was administered pretest and posttest (Return
to Summary of Finding).
Back to Top
Subject B-Listening Comprehension
Informal Reading Inventory-7th Edition (B/RIRI-7):
Narrative Text

Subject B’s
listening comprehension was also assessed using the B/RIRI-7 to
measure comprehension of third-grade narrative passages before and after
instruction in metacognitive strategies. The results revealed no
change in performance prior to and following intervention, subject B achieved a score of 50 on each
test (Return to Summary of Finding).
Back to Top
Informal Reading Inventory-7th Edition (B/RIRI-7):
Expository Text

Analysis of
listening comprehension skills for fifth-grade expository text passages
revealed a 60-point increase in score prior to and following
intervention. Subject
B achieved a score of 10%, 1 question answered correctly out of 10,
pre-intervention. Following intervention, subject B achieved a score of 70% correct, answering 7 of 10
questions correctly (Return to Summary of Finding).
Back to Top
Subject B-Metacognition
Developmental
Reading Assessment (DRA): Narrative Text

Subject B’s
ability to identify and apply strategies while reading remained constant
prior to and following intervention. No change in performance was observed in this
area (Return to Summary of Finding).
Back to Top
Developmental
Reading Assessment (DRA): Expository Text

Subject B’s
ability to identify and apply strategies for nonfiction text remained
unchanged, from pre-intervention to post-intervention. No gains were observed in this
area (Return to Summary of Finding).
Back to Top