|
Course: CT 496 Seminar in Theatre, Dance, and Speech Notes: Arts Education Landscape(for 2/8/99) Herbert, Doug. The National Arts Education Landscape: Past, Present, and Future. Arts Education Policy Review, Jul/Aug95, Vol 96 Issue 6, p13, 8p. |
Arthur Dirks Course Index Personal Page Main Index BSC Home |
Lecture notes on Herbert (1995) The National Arts Education Landscape
Help in establishing arts as basic:
- Reform of elementary and secondary education
- Integration of curriculum
- Authentic assessment
Need to make connections across disciplines
Bridge ideological and political boundaries
Sustain partnerships in arts and education communitiesArts must be concordant, not discordant
Growing synergy attributed to realizations:
- Arts organizations should work together
- Connecting arts to ed reform rather than apart from it
- Research and development: "determining whether what we do makes a difference"
Time frame:
1983
National Commisision on Excellence in Education published "A Nation At Risk"
1985
Congress required the National Endowment of the Arts to study the state of arts education.
1986
National Coalition for Education in the Arts established by the American Council for the Arts and Music Educators National Conference; developed the Philadelphia resolution.
1988
NEA published its report "Toward civilization," noting arts education is in jeopardy.
Recommendations:NEA developed arts in schools basic education grants for partnerships at state level. State arts agencies expanded to embrace arts education.
- Comprehensive definition of arts education
- Make arts part of basic education
- Develop partnerships to advocate for and provide comprehensive arts education.
1989
NEA began supporting the NCEA, published "Arts and School Reform" and "Advocacy through Partnership."NEA began working with US Department of Education:
- Development of national curriculum, content, achievement standards by consortium of national arts education associations.
- Development of a framework for inclusion of the arts in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) [omitted since 1977]
- Framing of arts education research agenda
- Foster communication among artists, teachers, others, through technology.
1990
National Goals 2000 announcment omitted arts in the curriculum goal.National Educational Goals Panel received comment from arts educators:
- Marked a political coming of age for arts adovcates
- Marked advantages of coalitions.
1992
Grammy Awards: Michael Greene notes arts are left out of goals
Birth of the national standards movement: recognition that standards should include the arts.
Consortium of National Arts Education Associations initiated a consensus process for National Standards for Arts Education (completed 1994)
NEA and DOE form Arts Partnership for America 2000.
- Development of the groundwork for the NAEP in the Arts in 1997
Richard Riley (head DOE) wrote Goals 2000, which became law in 1994. Provided implementation grants through DOE.
1994
Improving America's Scools Act. Recognized:Congress Authorizes Community Arts Partnership Act
- The arts are important forms of understanding
- Arts are important to excellent education
- Arts contribute to transformation of teaching and learning.
____________________________________________
Effectiveness of these efforts is dependent on state and local efforts
Goals 2000 Arts and Education Partnerships includes over 100 national arts and other organizations.
Must work both initiatives: as a core subject and as a developmental skill
Public perception of the arts remains that it is a frill.
All non-original content used by permission.
All original content protected by copyright.
Send comments to Arthur Dirks [adirks@bridgew.edu]
Webdesign by Dirks Designs & Consulting
Return to Main Site Index
BSC Home